Dario Antiseri, a scholar of Science and Philosophy

His work is characterized by a rigorous and systematic approach aimed at establishing a philosophy of science that reconciles the results of scientific research with the needs of philosophical reflection.

A Critical Realist

Antiseri has always identified as a critical realist, convinced that science provides us with an objective understanding of the world. However, his realism is not dogmatic; he emphasizes the necessity of constant critical revision of scientific theories in light of new empirical data.

Main Themes of His Philosophy

Philosophy of Science: Antiseri dedicated much of his studies to the philosophy of science, analyzing the epistemological foundations of various scientific disciplines. He addressed topics such as scientific realism, the relationship between theory and observation, the nature of scientific explanation, and the role of mathematics in the natural sciences.Metaphysics: Antiseri developed a realistic metaphysics based on the assumption of an external world independent of our mind. He tackled issues such as the nature of substance, the mind-body problem, and the possibility of knowledge about ultimate reality.Ethics: Antiseri reflected on the nature of ethics and its foundation. He argued for the existence of universal values grounded in human nature and reason.

The Impact of His Thought

Antiseri’s thought had a significant impact on contemporary Italian philosophy. His works have been translated into numerous languages and have been subjects of study and debate worldwide. In particular, his defense of scientific realism has contributed to revitalizing epistemological debates in Italy.

Critiques and Debates

Despite his success, Antiseri’s thought has not been immune to criticism. Some philosophers have challenged his defense of scientific realism, highlighting the limits of scientific knowledge and the need for a more humble and relativistic approach. Others have criticized his metaphysics as too traditional and insufficiently attentive to contemporary philosophical innovations.

Dario Antiseri: Comparisons, Science, Faith, Ethics, and Politics

Comparison with Popper and Kuhn

In the landscape of philosophy of science, Dario Antiseri occupies a position that presents affinities and distinctions with both Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn.

• Popper and Falsificationism: Like Popper, Antiseri is a proponent of scientific realism. Both believe that science aims to describe an objective reality independent of human thought. However, while Popper emphasizes falsifiability as a demarcation criterion between science and pseudoscience, Antiseri acknowledges the importance of falsifiability but also highlights the role of empirical confirmations in solidifying scientific theories.
• Kuhn and Paradigms: Unlike Kuhn, who emphasized the revolutionary nature of scientific changes and the importance of paradigms, Antiseri has a more cumulative view of science. While recognizing the existence of scientific revolutions, he emphasizes continuity in scientific progress and the role of previous theories in guiding research.

Science and Faith: A Tense Relationship

Antiseri has always maintained a clear distinction between science and faith. According to him, science investigates natural reality through empirical and rational methods, while faith is based on beliefs that cannot be empirically demonstrated. However, Antiseri has never denied the value of faith and acknowledged the importance of religious dimensions in human life.

Ethics and Politics: Universal Values and Practical Reason

For Antiseri, ethics is grounded in reason and human nature. He argued for the existence of universal values valid for all human beings regardless of culture or religion. According to Antiseri, ethics plays a fundamental role in building a just and peaceful society.In political matters, Antiseri has always advocated for democracy and human rights. He criticized totalitarian ideologies and defended individual freedom.

In Summary:

• Scientific Realism: Antiseri is a scientific realist like Popper but possesses a more nuanced view on scientific progress.
• Distinction between Science and Faith: The philosopher advocates for a clear separation between these two realms but recognizes faith’s value in human life.
• Ethics and Politics: Antiseri bases ethics on reason and human nature while supporting democracy and human rights.

Points for Further Exploration:

• The relationship between philosophy and science: Antiseri has always emphasized the importance of fruitful dialogue between philosophy and science.
• The issue of reduction: The philosopher addressed the problem of reducing human sciences to natural sciences.
• His conception of personhood: Antiseri developed a personalistic conception of humanity, emphasizing each individual’s dignity and freedom